Archive for February, 2009

The new element and saving meta data

Friday, February 13th, 2009

I gave Phandy a really hard time last week. I found the program to be a great concept, but I couldn’t get past the fact that it strips the meta data from the photos submitted to its service.

Today, I decided to review Elements. It’s another excellent concept walking in the footsteps of Twitter and Tumblr, allowing followers to “like” or “cast” clipped or uploaded photographs and quotes.

Unlike Phandy, Elements allows the members to upload photos as well as clip images found on the Web. But, like Phandy and many other photography-sharing sites, the process strips the meta data from the image.

Taking images from web sites, as well as stripping meta data, is as old as the Web itself.  I’ve known Facebook wants unlimited usage and photo applications may remove data.  But, it wasn’t until these new community sites whose purpose it is to encourage the sharing of interesting and unique content came online that I took a moment to pull my head out of the sand.

When a process or application strips the identity of an image, the opportunity for unfair use is increased.

Large companies behind legislation such as “orphan works” (Is orphan works a piece of legislation? Does it have a name?) are looking for excuses to profit from imagery without crediting or compensating the creator or copyright holder. Although orphan works is silent for now, don’t discount the fact that large money is behind the effort and the desire to revive it is strong.

The more images floating around the Internet, the greater the opportunity for misuse. Nothing new. But, again, I have to stress that these new sharing sites, as cool as they are, are factories for future abuse of your copyright.

It seems like the biggest culprits are the sites that downsize images from the original file for easy viewing. I assume keeping the meta data in the image is a technical challenge. Even Flickr removes the data from the smaller files on its site.

The only solution I can see is the creation of an application for resizing images without stripping the meta data. It would have to be open-source and easy-to-implement code. If this code is available, then there must be a campaign to encourage programmers to use it and make it standard.

Lastly, if photographers can’t trust the Web community to keep their meta data intact, photographers will have to take additional steps. The good practice of adding watermarks to images will have to become a standard for all new media photographers.

Similar sites will continue to come online. I don’t believe the programmers producing these sites are malicious or trying to hurt photographers. Most seem to be fans of photography and are sensitive to the issue.

Nonetheless, rather than spending my valuable time denouncing every offending web site, I would rather look for solutions. 

Do you have a solution?

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

My location portrait work flow

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009

This post might be useful for the beginning new media photographer.

While I was on Twitter @digitaldept requested a blog post about my executive portrait shoot from earlier in the day. Generally that is not what I blog about, but sharing my work flow as a new media photographer sounded like a good idea.  So, here is a summary of what I do. I’ll start with the moment I receive a job request and finish with the point of delivery.

Yesterday afternoon a client called my office. They needed a portrait of the chief executive officer of their company, who would be honored for his work in the coming weeks. 

My receptionist sent the message from the company’s marketing director to my voice mail. My voice mail system automatically calls me when a new message is placed in my box. I was able to return the call within 10 minutes. (Believe it or not, I actually lost a job Tuesday because it took me 15 minutes to call back). I asked my client about some of the details and said I would follow up after my current assignment. I also suggested that I would be most grateful if she would e-mail me the additional information about the job.

I should make note that many of my clients know my e-mail by heart. New clients also  find it extremely easy to e-mail me. I have one of the easiest e-mails in the world  to remember. My name is my e-mail: rosh@rosh.com.

When I returned to my office, the e-mail with all the details was waiting in my inbox. I returned the e-mail with a quote containing per- image pricing: X-price for the first image and a price about a third lower for each additional image. I always add the opportunity for more images to be purchased.  I offer per-image pricing to keep the value on the final image and not my time.

I arrived for the assignment shortly before 10:30 a.m. I was directed to set up in the executive’s office. I also was informed that he was on a conference call and had to leave at 11 a.m.

Pictured below is the equipment I use for quick executive portraits. Two Alien Bee monolights. I am a fan of Paul Buff products. Alien Bees are great travel lights because they take my abuse. When I abuse them a little too much, Buff’s company fixes them quickly.

I shoot portraits using my 5D with a 135mm 2.8 portrait lens. I usually create my portraits using an aperture of 2.8 for shallow depth of field and a shutter speed of  200 (the highest syc. Available for the 5D).

I place a light and umbrella to one side and a spot grid high over the top of the subject for a hair light. I’ll use a third light to spot the background, if necessary. I always use a reflector (usually a white reflector) on the other side of the subject’s face.

My portable backgrounds are collapsible and easy to store, carry and set up.  I carry my equipment in one load, much of it in a top-loading duffel bag found in most army navy surplus stores.

135mmalienbee

beegrids
twbsquare
background

It takes me about seven minutes to set up, five to 10 minutes to create about 35 images, and five minutes to break down. I arrived a few minutes early, so I was out of the executive’s office by 10:50 a.m.

I took the time to show the executive some of the images during the shoot. This is important when the subject is not smiling or has a grumpy disposition in general. Often it is easier for someone to accept the idea that they need to smile or make adjustments if they see or mention it first.

When I returned to my office I downloaded the images to a folder on my desktop. Next, I saved a raw copy of all the images on an external hard drive and then edited the images left on my desktop. After editing, I upload low-resolution images to photoshelter or create a personalized Photoshop Web site. (I altered one of the Photoshop templates to display some portfolio images and links to my Web sites.)

Today, I used the personal Web site option and e-mailed my client the link  to the raw images. Later in the day, the executive made his selection and e-mailed me his choice: img_4789.

I always offer basic adjustments as part of my package. I make any needed color corrections, touch ups around the eyes, highlights, and any slight clothing malfunctions.

When the image is complete,  I will send the large file via photoshelter, e-mail or CD — depending on the client preference.

Often, I will follow up the next day to make sure everything was to my client’s satisfaction.

Now you know my work flow for quick executive portraits.

What is yours?

Rosh

Below is one of my examples. Same background and set up. (This is not yesterday’s final shot, which is not 100 percent approved yet.)

photo by Rosh Sillars

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New media photographer podcast #35

Monday, February 9th, 2009

This week Rosh talks about and expands on a few ideas from his long list of blog posts and topics from the last week.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Five relevant posts from around the web

Saturday, February 7th, 2009

The customer is always wrongSeth Godin – about artists and the customer

How to defend your blogs copyrightProblogger

How to use content Marketing to Turn Prospects into buyersCopyblogger

specialties (relates to my rant on the “everything photographer”) -Foto biz

Tweet tubeMashable

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Great concept. Big problem.

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

phandy

Twitter is an easy-to-use platform that offers the user the opportunity to share thoughts, ideas and information in 140 characters or less.  Phandy is a new Twitter-like platform offering similar features for photography. 

Phandy shares the same look and feel as Twitter, but rather than sharing your thoughts, you share photos.  You can follow the main stream of  images or photographs from your favorite content providers. One nice feature is the ability to view images through a Cooliris slide show application.

The platform offers many of the best basic features of photography-sharing Web sites, such as the ability to comment on photographs, select favorites, and tag images for easy search.

With all the photography sharing and Twitter wannabes online, I feel this site could have the potential for mass appeal. 

Unfortunately, once I started to explore how to use the site my heart sank.  The concept is excellent. But when I tried to upload my photographs to share with my potential followers, I realized there is no such mechanism. 

The method in which you share photographs on Phandy is to add the “share to phandy” link to your browser or bookmark list.  When you find an image you like on a Web site, you click the button and it highlights the images on the page for you to select and share with your Phandy community. This action alone offers a huge potential for abuse.

After pondering the ramifications of Web surfers wandering the net with the intention of  sharing other people’s work, the thought came to me:  I wonder if the process of sharing images with Phandy strips the meta data from the file?  Based on my tests it does! 

I am so disappointed.  I’m sure the designers of Phandy had good intentions; unfortunately, I believe they have created a destructive monster.

I plan on sharing my concerns with Phandy. I encourage you to do the same.  Phandy could be a wonderful platform to share your images.  But, in its current state, it is not.

Rosh

 

 

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]