Last month I sacrificed a quality Google image listing for an experiment.
The second photograph on the left is my image. It comes up under the search term “people photographer.” I am well-represented in that department. My Web site portfolio tends to appear consistently in the top five.
The front-page image of my people site has been represented in the top four for at least a year. While reviewing my rankings, the thought came to me that the two-image collage on my front page was not marked as a copyrighted image. I wondered what would happen if I changed it to a copyrighted image in the meta data?
Within five days the image was no longer listed as one of the top four images. I waited a few weeks to see if it would reappear. It did not.
Next, I made some needed adjustments to the image and removed the copyright information in the meta data. I also strengthened the SEO on the image. It took about two weeks for it to return.
If I’m looking for Google’s attention, should I spend more time adding key words to my images without the copyright tag in the meta data?
The biggest question I have to answer is: What is the value of having a photograph as one of the four displayed for the world to see every time someone types “people photographer” into Google’s search window?
The next experiment might be to see how large a watermark, if any, I can slap on the image without getting booted. For now, I’m going to leave well enough alone. I like the traffic.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=84ca8248-13ce-4fd6-a4e5-f3ae06059c6c)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=1dca12b5-206f-43f4-8b9e-1d31f71f6479)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=536242a7-be99-4688-9233-8b4c45955ac3)




