Posts Tagged ‘adwords’

New Media Photographer Podcast 97

Monday, April 19th, 2010

This week: Rosh talks about finding new photography opportunities.  Do you know where the new opportunities are?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Adwords for photographers

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

First, I want to thank @picseshu for encouraging me to write more about AdWords.

I’ve spent some time lately dismissing AdWords due to my frustration with Google’s bidding system and click fraud. All that aside, AdWords still offers photographers many opportunities.

There is a lot to AdWords. Now that I’m running more AdWords campaigns for Synectics Media clients, I’m taking another serious look at how the advertising medium can benefit photographers. I can’t share everything in one post, but I will make it a point to add the topic to the rotation of subjects I cover on this blog and podcast.

What is AdWords?

It is a pay-per-click system offered by Google and other search engines. You can create text-based advertisements for search engine results relevant to your Web site.

Sometimes search engine optimization (SEO) doesn’t offer the search placement results photographers require. Google AdWords allows photographers to buy their way to the front page of Google, related Web sites or Google partner search engines.

Many photographers have given up on AdWords. This is especially the case after Google changed its system of bidding on ads. This is good news because now there is less competition driving up bid prices.

Is AdWords right for you?

If you wish to sell cheap stock photography or low-cost head shots, it may not work. You have to test the system to see what works for you. The good news is you can test for a fraction of the cost of other ad models with better tracking information. This will allow you to test, change ads, and figure out if your plan will work before wasting an entire advertising budget.

Fortunately, photographers have higher price points and can risk a larger amount of money and still receive a quality return on investment. If done well, AdWords should be profitable (with tests and tweaking) within a month depending on the target, skill and competition.

The first thing you need to understand about AdWords is that it works like search engine optimization. Relevant words in the ads need to match the landing page, which is the page the ads are directed toward. Unfortunately, most photographers link their front page to AdWords campaigns. In many cases, photography Web sites don’t even have words on the front page. This lowers their Google ad score and ultimately costs money and quality placement.

Google wants its ads to work. If an ad score is too low based on Google’s criteria, a photographer can’t even buy his way onto the front page. This is why a good customized HTML landing page is recommended. Photographers need to create landing pages related to the search terms they are trying to attract.

If a photographer is bidding on the words “food photographer,” the ad should lead to a page with good information about her food photography. The ads should contain images to keep people on the page, quality written information about the service, and a method of contact. A form requesting more information is often advised to support the collection of prospects’ e-mails for future campaigns.

Be careful of the automatic tools Google offers. Many are valuable. Others, unfortunately,  optimize best for Google’s profits rather than the advertiser’s success. An example of this is auto bidding. Use Google tools and make your own judgments on how much to bid on keywords.

Use tools such as Google’s  Insight for Search and Keyword Tools to help find the best high-traffic related keywords. Start off with two to four unique ads using the keywords related to the search words bid on.

Consider focusing on local advertising placement. It seems like the more localized and geographically focused it is, the less click fraud is involved. Note: Click fraud has been estimated to be as high as 33 percent  for some expensive key words. Another way to fight against click fraud is to avoid content advertisement placements until you understand the system better. These are ads found on Web sites. Fortunately, Google allows advertisers to manage their ad placements. This can be very beneficial if you know or suspect a local high-traffic Web site may attract photography buyers.

To start a campaign, log into AdWords and set up an account. Decide on your best keywords. Remember the importance of search engine optimization. Use custom landing pages or subdomains connected to the main site and test, test, test everything until you find the winning combination.

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Applications I don’t like anymore

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

There are a number of applications that I thought I would like, that I started to like, but in the end decided were not for me.   The deciding factors quite often were layout or workflow.  I can adapt fairly well to new applications. Sometimes, though, it’s easier to use the old application. Others never worked well for me from the start. Here are a few of my experiences:

TweetDeck: It’s a great idea. But, it is a memory hog and always seems to take too much effort to open.  When it is open, TweetDeck dominates my work space, preventing me from doing the things I need to do.  The traditional Web application seems to fit my workflow much better.

* Feedly: (*update: check comments) This was a great recommendation from the New Media Photographer community.  It’s easy to use and  has a clean interface.  So, what is the problem?  I can’t search targeted feeds like I can with Google reader.  I depend on the ability to search specific feeds with targeted key words as part of my New Media Photographer research.  Feedly buries the blogs I really want to keep up with even if I don’t read them every day.

AdWords: I’ve mentioned this one a number of times over the last few weeks.  I’m growing more negative each day about this advertising platform, especially since they implemented the new rating system last year.  I was fine with traditional auction bidding.  It’s just getting too expensive for such poor results.

Facebook Advertising: Useless.

Cuil: I had hope for this one in the beginning.  The search engine actually offers results that favor my business.  Recently, I revisited Cuil. Its search results and the layout seem better, but it’s still confusing.  My biggest complaint? The search engine does a poor job of matching images with the search results.

Cooliris: I thought this was cool at first, but soon found myself very dizzy.  I’m also starting to think most applications made with Adobe Air are just too heavy.

Adobe Air: See TweetDeck and Cooliris.

Any application that schedules my Tweets: I thought such applications might be useful, but I realized they take the social out of social media. Although I don’t use them, I can still see the benefit of an occasional scheduled announcement.

Bing: I’m put off by how hard Microsoft has been buying Bing into our lives.  Even my new phone has Bing on it.  Is it a better application than Google? No.

Firefox: Maybe it’s how I have it set up.  I find it harder to bookmark and retrieve information.  I have to keep switching back to Safari. That’s sad.

What applications have you stopped using?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Interview with Dan Corrigan: Podcast #119

Monday, October 20th, 2008

This week I interview Dan Corrigan. Dan is a search engine analyst for a large Metro Detroit ad agency.  He’s also a certified adwords specialist.  Dan and I talk about SEO for the photographer, adwords and analytics.

I announce this week’s New Media Photographer photo media edge award winner. (I’ll post on the blog Tuesday.)

Play
Play