Posts Tagged ‘links’

Promoting your web site with comments: should you?

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

I recently had an issue with another blogger about my one of my comments.  I made a quick but relevant comment on his blog, which I really enjoy.  The host of the blog took exception to my comment and accused me of being a spammer.

I must concede that I had a few red flags in my post.  First, at the end of my post, I said, “thanks for sharing.”  If you have a blog, you know that many of the spam posts say, “thanks for sharing”.  My bad.   Second, as you may know, I often place http://www.newmediaphotographer.com under my name.   Three, having a short post with the elements above is a clear strikeout.

In my defense, I’ve been commenting and an active participant on this blog for a while.  I am mindful of the quality of my comments, especially when commenting on a new blog and using the newmediaphotographer link signature.

The blogger and I exchanged a few emails on the topic and all is well.

But, this situation brought up an interesting point.  What is the etiquette for commenting on a blog? 

I’ve inquired with other bloggers, read a number of posts on the topic, and have found as many points of view as there are blogs. 

My point is that blogging is about sharing information via the Internet. The foundation of the Internet is linking between pages.  Blog comments need to be sincere and related to the post topic. 

This is my definition of a spam comment: One that contains generic information, or a response or statements containing a link leading to an unrelated product, service, blog or web site.

As a photographer, artist, blogger or business owner,  a link to your portfolio, blog, Flickr page, web site or biography adds relevance and depth to who you are as a commenter and member of a blog’s community.  A link on the page is an invitation to readers to learn more about you.  This should be encouraged, not frowned upon.

A number of bloggers feel that such a link has elements of spam and a number of blogs have software running that will block and mark comments as spam that contain links.

I also run anti-spam software. But, in my opinion, link-blocking software, editing and moderating is “un-internet” and are counter to what the web is all about.  Yes, it is important be concerned about the integrity of your blog.   But, to not allow guests and community members to share personal and relevant links is extremely selfish.

It is true that often a link is attached to the commentor’s name within the title of the comment post.  But, knowing there may be a link attached to a name does not invite the reader to explore more about a commenter.   If you know anything about web site design, you understand that it is important to make the layout simple, easy, obvious and inviting. 

By placing my web site or blog link below my name I am inviting interested community members to learn more about me and visit my blog.  If you don’t invite people they will generally not take the initiative, even if all they have to do is move the cursor back to the top of the comment. That is still too much work.

Normally, I might receive five, ten, twenty referrals from a post if I place my blog address under my name.  The more relevant and interesting my comments, the more traffic.  That sounds fair to me.

I tried some tests on a few blogs where I frequently post comments.  In some of my comments I just placed my name. Within others I left my name and new media photographer (no link). I also put new media photographer rather than my name, in some cases, in the standard blog link.  All the posts had what I considered to be good comments that would normally generate traffic.  In the end all the posts offered the same result.  No traffic. 

I’m sure if I offered extreme views and controversy I might get some traffic.  But, those types of posts wouldn’t normally be authentic coming from me.  I just want to be a part of my favorite blog communities and offer quality responses, information and commentary.

Yes, we want people to visit our blogs and web sites.  If quality comments are offered within the blogosphere, we should also be rewarded with traffic. If our sites offer good content we will be rewarded with subscribers. 

What do you think?

New Media photographer Down – update

Monday, July 14th, 2008

We’ve had some serious database and feed issues since the first days. Today, we have rolled up our sleeves and are working hard to get it back up to 100%.

We have reestablished much of the site. Tags, photos, links etc. still need to be updated. The process should be complete by the end of the evening. But, of course, it’s a never ending process….

Thanks
Rosh

Please visit

http://www.prosperousartists.com

The art of keyword placement: photography SEO secret #4

Friday, July 11th, 2008

SEO for photographers.

Where you place your words and how they are emphasized makes a
difference.

Key words placed near the top of the web page take priority over words
place at the bottom of the page. Words emphasized in bold and with
<H1> tags offer higher value then plan text.
Google wants your key words, but they only need to see them a few
times to be satistified that your page is supporting its claims. But,
Google is not the only game in town. The other players (Yahoo, ask,
live) tend to be more receptive to additional key words, but you don’t
want to be punished by Google for Key word “stuffing”.

For example:

Rosh Sillars is a Detroit people photographer specializing in
people. He likes photographing people on location and shooting
people in the studio. As a Detroit people photographer he takes
pride in his people photography.

As you can see the word people is over done and the paragraph really
doesn’t sound very good. Although, for some search engines the above
sentence would be effective, Google would again look down upon a web
site full of such paragraphs. So, balance is a key.
Secret #4: Key word emphasis and placement is about balance.

Rosh

Links:photography SEO secrets number 3

Friday, July 4th, 2008

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where
readers can share and discover new web pages.

I know it may seem that some of the secrets are obvious, if you have
been around SEO for a while, but what is correct is correct. I will bring
this all together in the fifth segment. I think the last post will be very
telling and helpful in your quests for Googles front page.

Actually, number one is where you want to be. The last statistics I
observed where people hit the first link in a search 44% of the time and
number two 11% and it’s all down hill from there.

Secret number #3: Links are the gold of search engine optimization.
Quality links mean everything. Links from other sites related to your site.
For example. If you are a photographer and have a link from a web site
talking about politics and nothing about photography, the value is much
lower. Blog links are great. EDU and GOV links are wonderful. Yes there
is a hierarchy.

So trade links with relevant sites. If people are willing to link to the
information and content you are offering, then the search engines will
consider you more of an expert.

Happy 4th!

Rosh

SEO for photographers: Secret Number 2

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008

SEO for photographers

So far I’ve receive good response about this series. Feel free to link to
the posts that resinate with you.

Today is secret number 2: Your title is your first touch.
The first thing people often see in search results is the title tag. Note:
Google indexes pages not web sites. The title tag is considered very
important. Don’t use your name, name of your company or off the wall
wacky titles. It needs to be descriptive.

Consider your most important keys words such as where your located.
”Dallas portrait photographer” for example.

Key word stuffing will only find you at the back of the line.

I’m not sure how many days I’ll share these secrets. My competition is
watching. :-)

Rosh