Posts Tagged ‘search engine Optimization’

Wrong answer

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

I had a project estimate presentation with a large client.  We had a long list of topics and services to discuss.  One of the services was search engine optimization (SEO).

I was asked to justify the price tag for SEO.  I explained what we do, the actions, research and management of each page.  Although my response was accepted by the client,  I felt my answer was incomplete.  It was the wrong answer.

SEO is a valuable service.  Much of my photography work comes from people finding my portfolio through the search engines.  SEO works.  In fact, this company originally found our Web site because of our SEO efforts.

So what was wrong with my answer? I focused on what our company does — what some might call the features. No one really cares about feature details, only how the features will benefit them.

The client only needed to know one thing: Better search engine placement will help them make more money.

SEO is a good investment. The client most likely will earn back more than they paid for the service. I know it. I’ve experienced it.  The future of most companies hinges on being highly visible on the Internet.

The same principle holds true for your photography.  Your work is valuable.  When someone asks you  to justify your price, make sure you have a good answer. Here are a few examples:

  • “My photography will help you sell more products.”
  • “You are losing money with the poor photography on your Web site.”
  • “I will make you look beautiful.
  • My vision, style and passion will capture the memories of  the most important day of your life.”

People don’t care how you’re going to do it. They just need the justification to spend money on the amazing results you will provide.

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Adwords for photographers

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

First, I want to thank @picseshu for encouraging me to write more about AdWords.

I’ve spent some time lately dismissing AdWords due to my frustration with Google’s bidding system and click fraud. All that aside, AdWords still offers photographers many opportunities.

There is a lot to AdWords. Now that I’m running more AdWords campaigns for Synectics Media clients, I’m taking another serious look at how the advertising medium can benefit photographers. I can’t share everything in one post, but I will make it a point to add the topic to the rotation of subjects I cover on this blog and podcast.

What is AdWords?

It is a pay-per-click system offered by Google and other search engines. You can create text-based advertisements for search engine results relevant to your Web site.

Sometimes search engine optimization (SEO) doesn’t offer the search placement results photographers require. Google AdWords allows photographers to buy their way to the front page of Google, related Web sites or Google partner search engines.

Many photographers have given up on AdWords. This is especially the case after Google changed its system of bidding on ads. This is good news because now there is less competition driving up bid prices.

Is AdWords right for you?

If you wish to sell cheap stock photography or low-cost head shots, it may not work. You have to test the system to see what works for you. The good news is you can test for a fraction of the cost of other ad models with better tracking information. This will allow you to test, change ads, and figure out if your plan will work before wasting an entire advertising budget.

Fortunately, photographers have higher price points and can risk a larger amount of money and still receive a quality return on investment. If done well, AdWords should be profitable (with tests and tweaking) within a month depending on the target, skill and competition.

The first thing you need to understand about AdWords is that it works like search engine optimization. Relevant words in the ads need to match the landing page, which is the page the ads are directed toward. Unfortunately, most photographers link their front page to AdWords campaigns. In many cases, photography Web sites don’t even have words on the front page. This lowers their Google ad score and ultimately costs money and quality placement.

Google wants its ads to work. If an ad score is too low based on Google’s criteria, a photographer can’t even buy his way onto the front page. This is why a good customized HTML landing page is recommended. Photographers need to create landing pages related to the search terms they are trying to attract.

If a photographer is bidding on the words “food photographer,” the ad should lead to a page with good information about her food photography. The ads should contain images to keep people on the page, quality written information about the service, and a method of contact. A form requesting more information is often advised to support the collection of prospects’ e-mails for future campaigns.

Be careful of the automatic tools Google offers. Many are valuable. Others, unfortunately,  optimize best for Google’s profits rather than the advertiser’s success. An example of this is auto bidding. Use Google tools and make your own judgments on how much to bid on keywords.

Use tools such as Google’s  Insight for Search and Keyword Tools to help find the best high-traffic related keywords. Start off with two to four unique ads using the keywords related to the search words bid on.

Consider focusing on local advertising placement. It seems like the more localized and geographically focused it is, the less click fraud is involved. Note: Click fraud has been estimated to be as high as 33 percent  for some expensive key words. Another way to fight against click fraud is to avoid content advertisement placements until you understand the system better. These are ads found on Web sites. Fortunately, Google allows advertisers to manage their ad placements. This can be very beneficial if you know or suspect a local high-traffic Web site may attract photography buyers.

To start a campaign, log into AdWords and set up an account. Decide on your best keywords. Remember the importance of search engine optimization. Use custom landing pages or subdomains connected to the main site and test, test, test everything until you find the winning combination.

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

New and noteworthy

Sunday, February 7th, 2010

Google now allows you to follow updates on any Web site even if it doesn’t have a really simple syndication (RSS) feed. In my opinion, RSS is one of the most underutilized and powerful Web tools available.  Google has upped the game by making every site an RSS feed through their Google Reader.  I’m thinking about my competitor’s Web site as a great test for the new application.  If you want to do the same, take a Web site and place it in the add a subscription box in Google reader. Google will make note that it is not a traditional RSS feed and ask if you would like one.

Speaking of RSS: If you are interested in receiving feeds via e-mail, even if the option is not provided, feedmyinbox.com seems like an easy solution.  They offer free and premium services.

Astronaut Soichi Noguchi is sharing his images on twitpics from the space station http://twitpic.com/119les.

Citrify is a clean online photography editing platform. It is quick and easy to use. It offers a premium version, but the free version has all the basics you would expect, plus some useful filters and effects.

Seed.com: This is a new site from AOL designed to give writers and photographers opportunities to be published on its network of properties.   They offer a list of assignments on various subjects that pay from $25 to $100.

Seed.com offers three types of  license agreements for your work. Please read the terms of service before you send a piece.  In the rights-grab environment we live in, I’ve seen much worse.  Decide for yourself.

Woorank.com is a site I mention on the podcast. It’s a new search engine optimization evaluation option.

http://www.tweetyourmail.com If you receive an interesting e-mail, you can now tweet it.

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The benefits of photography 365 project

Wednesday, January 6th, 2010

On Jan. 1, 2010, I started my 365 project.

A 365 photography project is based on the commitment to post photographs — often random — representing each day of the year.

There are many variations and approaches to the project. Some people post to a traditional blog. Others send images to a flickr, tumblr or posterous account. Some people choose to upload their images once a day, once a week or when they feel like it.  My project is a daily commitment to post. Every day I capture an image and post it.

Participants don’t have to take a random approach to the project. Some photographers focus on a theme: people, landscapes, nature, family or documentary images. There is even a 365 cloud project.

A large number of the 365 photographers use their phones and are a big part of the phone photography movement.

Traditionally the 365 project is known as an opportunity for amateur photographers to learn new skills, develop their style and keep photographing without the benefit of regular professional assignments.

It’s easy to see why many professionals do not embrace this concept. But, I felt it was an opportunity to stretch my abilities and keep my skills sharp. I don’t photograph for local media outlets much anymore. Since most of my projects are larger and more spread out, it means I don’t find a camera in my hands on a daily basis anymore.

I’ve become better known in the photographic community for my writing, marketing and social media ideas. I wanted to take the opportunity to share more of my photography abilities while participating in social media. This project is a perfect fit.

The search engine optimization for my blog and images is also beneficial. Although I’m posting to a blog, I’m also using the benefits of flickr.com to share my work.

After only five days I’ve already laid the foundation for a community  around the new photography blog. More people are visiting my flickr images and I’m amazed at the passion of the new audience.

I’m experimenting with different types of images and asking questions of the community. Not every image is perfect. In fact, the more flaws I point out the more constructive engagement I seem gain from the community.

I encourage you start a 365 project. It’s not that hard to fit in your workflow. You will improve or learn new skills, build a new audience, give yourself the opportunity to have fun with your craft and improve your visibility in the photography world. What’s not to like about that?

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]