Posts Tagged ‘Search Engines’

Google’s free interior photos: new opportunity or not?

Tuesday, April 27th, 2010

Google introduced Google Places last week as part of its ongoing focus on local search. One of the features is free interior photography.

You can either get mad about this or look at it as an opportunity.

This development allows Google to step inside local retailers and offer a visual reference of that business for search customers. An exterior photograph is good for directions.  But, as most people know, judging a book by its cover can be misleading.  So, Google is taking the next step.

Of course, Google has no right to enter a business and take photographs for their search pages.  To achieve its goal, Google needed an incentive plan.  It turns out that offering a free photograph to illustrate how great a business is and including it within a Google search business page is the perfect incentive.

Yes, they do have plans to use the images in other applications, too.

I’m not recommending that photographers knock on Google’s door looking for work. I don’t think it would be very rewarding or profitable.  Still, Google has opened its doors to a great opportunity. What they have done is create a chance to increase the value of interior photography.  Photographers specializing in interiors have an opening to sell the fact that their clients’ images can now be displayed for search prospects. Businesses can allow Google to take the photograph, upload their own snapshot or hire a professional if they wish to upgrade their business page interior display.

This is all about supply and demand. The need or demand for interior photographs should increase.  Not every retailer will understand the benefit. But, if even a percentage of businesses see the value of standing out from their competition in the online search space, interior photographers have a chance to add to their bottom lines.

My plan is to show my interior portfolio to businesses and explain this new opportunity.  I will also inform my prospects that these photographs will represent their business to the world. They have a choice: let Google provide a free picture, shoot it themselves or hire a professional. I will mention this as they scroll through my iPad portfolio (coming soon). I will also direct them to Google Maps, so they can evaluate Google’s last photography project related to their business.

The reality is the Google photographs will most likely be very poor quality. Your great photographs present an opportunity to both you and your clients. If they hire you, it will help them stand out from their competitors who chose the free route.

Local search will inevitably develop and mature, demanding higher quality images. Soon, smart phones and portable tablets will outpace traditional computers as search devices.

When devices offer the ability to display images beautifully, people will demand more beautiful images.

For more information on Google Places click here:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Who is stealing your work?

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

You might be surprised to learn that your online writing, photography and videos are being used by someone else on the Internet in an attempt to make money. These content thieves operate on the theory that using previously published material along with Google ads will lead to piles of cash.

Some do make money using this method; most do not.  One reason this approach doesn’t work well is that Google recognizes and redirects readers to the original content source .

I checked copyscape.com the other day to see if anyone was using material from my photography Web sites to promote their sites.

Turns out, people are swiping my content. I was a little peeved at first. Then I wondered: did I encourage content theft? On my roshsillars.com site, I write about the importance of photography in marketing.  I can recall encouraging others on one of my podcasts to use my ideas to promote the importance of good photography in marketing. Whether I encouraged people use my concepts, it’s not a good idea to use other peoples wording exactly.  The reality is some people just copied my site.

There is justice. If people swipe your content word for word, chances are they will gain very little search engine traffic. In most cases if visitors from the other site use the swiped information they saw from the imposter Site in a search engine it will benefit you. Chances are they will end up directed to your site not the imposter site.  In other words, they are advertising for you.

If I’m concerned about an image or video being taken, I don’t post it. Or I’ll make sure I have a good watermark on it.  If nothing else, I know I will get some free advertising out of the thief.

It’s a touchy subject, what are your thoughts?

Below are some links to helpful tools.

http://www.copyscape.com : Search the Web to see who might be using your writing.

http://www.tineye.com : This is a reverse search engine that tracks who is using your photographs.

http://www.copyright.gov : Use this site to copyright your work.

http://www.google.com/alerts : This helps you keep track of key words.

http://copyrightspot.com : Another site to detect plagiarism of your work.

http://www.doccop.com Here is another plagiarism detector. I’ve not tested it.

It’s a touchy subject, what are your thoughts?

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Latest on Google Wave

Wednesday, March 10th, 2010

Following the deafening silence from the Internet community and calls that last year’s hyped platform is dead, Google is working to improve its beta version of Wave.

It’s no secret that I’m a Wave fan.  I’m also realistic.  Google has to make  many improvements. Here are some of the developments:

As I’ve recommended,  it is important to keep up with new activity on your Waves. One solution is to install a browser plug-in. I’m using the Firefox plug-in for Wave.

Hyped as the e-mail killer, Google Wave is now using e-mail to keep users up-to-date with their accounts. To add e-mail notifications, look for the settings next to the inbox icon. I believe this is a smart move and should benefit all users.

In January, Google also added a read-only function to Wave. Previously, all Waves had read and write functions, which allowed people to make changes to any Wave to which they had access.  This is part of the appeal of Wave. When you make a Wave public, however, this can lead to problems. Another nice feature:  click on the individual members of a Wave to adjust their access.

Google also improved the history function by creating a restore option.  Not only can you view the history of a Wave, but also you can restart the Wave at a previous point in its history.

The Google team says it plans on adding a reply only option too.  This would allow users to add and adjust their comments without affecting the rest of the Wave. (I think that concept is also called a blog.)

I like Google’s improvements. Although speed is still an issue, it seems to be getting a little better.  If you have not tried Google Wave,  give it a shot.  Collaborate on a project. Plan an event with friends or family.  Share information with the Wave community or plan a photo shoot with other people.  The uses are endless once you understand the basic concept of this collaborative tool.

Rosh

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

About Google Buzz

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

Google announced Buzz last week.  I thought I would give it time to breathe before I reviewed it.  Below is a new media photographer video about Buzz.

Advantages:

It’s in your Gmail.
Highly indexable (good for SEO)
You can connect with new people not traditionally using social media.
The Google smart phone application is a plus.

Disadvantage:
Like FriendFeed, it’s information overload.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]